Posts from February 2025.
Preserving evidence is key to defending premises liability cases in Michigan.
Comments
Topics
- Premises Liability
- Civil Litigation
- Retail Liability
- Property Liability
- Personal Injury
- Contractor Liability
- Litigation Discovery
- Construction Contractors
- Construction Law
- Insurance
- Appellate Law
- Residential Liability
- Fire Claims
- General Liability
- Contracts
- Motor Vehicle Liability
- Commercial Liability
- Water Loss Claims
- insurance policy
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Fraud Activity
- Commercial Real Estate
- Investigations
- Governmental Immunity
- Open & Obvious Doctrine
- Snow & Ice Claims
- Marine Liability
- Maritime Law
- Artificial Intelligence
- Design Defect
- Industrial Liability
- Lost Earnings
- Open & Obvious
- Risk Management
- Video Recording
- Defamation
- Business Risk Management
- Liquor Liability
- Professional Liability
- Negligence
- Independent Medical Examinations (IME)
- Sports-liability
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Auto Liability
- Bankruptcy
- Intoxication
- Judicial Estoppel
- No Fault Liability
- Trucking Liability
- Wrongful Death
- Real Estate
- FDA Regulations
- Food Law
- Foodservice & Hospitality
- Regulatory Law
- Constructive Notice
Recent Updates
- Businesses can Bolster Lack of Notice Defense by Documenting Premises Inspections
- Avoiding the Premises Liability Trap of ‘Lost’ Evidence
- Appellate Court Faults Construction Company for Halting Work for Nonpayment in Breach of Agreed Upon Contract
- New Scope of Ohio Home Construction Suppliers Services Act Takes Effect
- The Skeptical Brain Injury – How Do You Prepare to Defend it?
- Post-Open and Obvious: What Property Owners Can Do to Protect Themselves
- Lessons in Civil Procedure and Civility from a Surprising Source: Barbie
- ‘Open and Obvious’ Falls, Restoring Focus on ‘Notice’ Defense in Michigan Premises Liability Cases
- Insurance Provider’s ‘Satisfaction’ Maketh the Proof of Loss
- The High Seas and High Risks of Lithium Batteries