On June 30, 2014, the EEOC issued a press release advising that Princeton Health Care System (PHCS) will pay $1.35 million and will “undertake significant remedial measures to settle a disability discrimination lawsuit brought by the [EEOC].”
PHCS’ leave policy followed the requirements of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and provided its employees 12 weeks of leave. Under PHCS’ policy, employees not eligible for FMLA leave were terminated after a short absence from work. In addition, other employees were terminated after they exhausted their 12 weeks of FMLA leave.
This recent settlement further emphasizes the EEOC’s consistent and clear position that an employer may have to modify its inflexible leave policy in order to satisfy its duty under the Americans with Disabilities Act to provide a reasonable accommodation to a qualified employee.
When dealing with complicated leave scenarios, employers must continue to carefully coordinate their leave and reasonable accommodation policies to ensure compliance with both the FMLA and the ADA.
- Partner
A member of Plunkett Cooney's Bloomfield Hills office, Courtney L. Nichols serves as the firm's Litigation Department Leader.
Ms. Nichols focuses her litigation practice in the area of employment law, including discrimination ...
Add a comment
Topics
- Employment Liability
- Labor Law
- Human Resources
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Minimum Wage
- Wage & Hour
- Employment Discrimination
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Employment Agreement
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- National Labor Relations Act
- At Will Employment
- COVID-19
- Noncompete Agreements
- Earned Sick Time
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- National Labor Relations Board
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Coronavirus
- Civil Rights
- Contract Employees
- Regulatory Law
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Tax Law
- Title VII
- OSHA Issues
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Retaliation
- Sick Leave
- Federal Trade Commission
- Workplace Harassment
- Unemployment Benefits
- Civil Litigation
- Settlements
- Contracts
- Transgender Issues
- Business Risk Management
- Hostile Work Environment
- Accommodations
- First Amendment
- ERISA
- Workers' Compensation
- Public Education
- Cannabis
- Department of Justice
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Medicare Issues
- Sexual Harassment
- Garnishments
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- RICO
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Diversity
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Michigan Legislature Avoids Chaos by Amending Earned Sick Time Act Just Prior to Deadline
- Implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Key Insights for Employers
- Federal Court Throws out DOL’s Attempt to Rewrite White Collar Overtime Rules
- Civil Rights Litigation Filed by Christian Employers Gets New Life Following Federal Appellate Court Ruling
- Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Wage Decision
- Judge Strikes Down Federal Ban on Non-compete Agreements
- Michigan Employers Can Legally Resist Union Organizing Efforts
- Michigan Supreme Court Decision Reinstates Previous Versions of Wage Laws
- Union Power in Michigan: Is it Real or Imagined?
- Employers Should act Now to Address Rising DOL Salary Thresholds for Exempt Employees