Working with an expert to support a product defect theory of liability is hard enough as it is. However, when the standard for strict liability is considered, properly supporting such a theory is even harder. A commonly overlooked aspect of products liability is knowing the specific state standard that needs to be met and preparing for such a standard with your expert. Upon review of a certified question from a federal appeals court, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia (Supreme Court of WV) recently addressed its standard for strict products liability.
In Judith A. Shears and Gary F. Shears, Jr. v. Ethicon, Inc., No. 23-192, 2024 W.Va. LEXIS 272, petitioners Judith and Gary Shears (the Shears) were several of more than 28,000 plaintiffs to file cases against respondent Ethicon, Inc. (Ethicon) alleging damages from the use of its Tension-Free Vaginal Tape. The Shears filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia (District Court), asserting claims that included strict liability based on a defective product design. Ethicon challenged the court’s consolidation of the case with others similarly situated, arguing that the Shears did not offer an alternative design that would have materially reduced the plaintiff’s injuries.Continue Reading
Recent Posts
Categories
- Contracts
- Products Liability
- Damages
- Limitation of Liability
- Virginia
- Economic Loss Rule
- Construction Defects
- CPSC Recalls
- Statute of Limitations-Repose
- Subrogation
- Negligence
- South Carolina
- Texas
- New York
- Evidence
- Experts – Daubert
- Litigation
- Massachusetts
- New Jersey
- Experts - Reliability
- Certificate of Merit
- California
- Jurisdiction
- Maryland
- Indemnification
- Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Causation
- Landlord-Tenant
- Sutton Doctrine
- Waiver of Subrogation
- Uncategorized
- Pennsylvania
- Condemnation
- CPSC Warning
- Minnesota
- Florida
- Rhode Island
- Cargo - Transportation
- Malpractice
- Spoliation
- Tennessee
- Indiana
- Michigan
- Comparative-Contributory Negligence
- Contribution-Apportionment
- AIA Contracts
- Product Liability
- Arbitration
- Assignment
- Missouri
- Parties
- Public Policy
- Civil Procedure
- Res Judicata
- Damages – Personal Property
- West Virginia
- Wyoming
- Oklahoma
- Builder's Risk
- Contractual Subrogation
- Equitable Subrogation
- Georgia
- Illinois
- Insurable Interest
- Mississippi
- Made Whole
- Delaware
- Settlement
- Subrogation – Equitable
- Construction
- Premises Liability
- Joint or Several Liability
- Montana
- Duty
- Privity
- New Mexico
- Right to Repair Act
- Landlord
- Tenant
- Building Code
- Arizona
Tags
- Construction Defects
- Products Liability
- Limitation of Liability
- Architects-Engineers
- Damages
- Incorporation by Reference
- Virginia
- Economic Loss Doctrine
- Contracts
- Subrogation
- Product Liability
- Construction Contracts
- Texas
- Statute of Limitations
- Economic Loss Rule
- Negligence
- Statute of Repose
- Statute of Limitations – Discovery Rule
- New York
- Evidence
- Oklahoma
- Waiver of Subrogation
- Massachusetts
- Circumstantial Evidence
- Experts - Reliability
- Experts – Daubert
- New Jersey
- Landlord-Tenant
- CPSC Recalls; Products Liability
- Certificate of Merit
- Indemnification
- Malfunction Theory
- Gist of the Action
- Experts
- Maryland
- California
- Amazon-eBay
- Contracts - Enforcement
- Louisiana
- Jurisdiction
- Jurisdiction - Personal
- Georgia
- Pennsylvania
- Civil Procedure
- Illinois
- Causation
- Sutton Doctrine
- Condemnation
- Inverse Condemnation
- Florida
- Minnesota
- Statute of Limitations - Accrual
- Arizona
- Public Policy
- Indiana
- Experts – Qualifications
- Anti-Subrogation Rule
- West Virginia
- Negligent Undertaking
- Statute of Limitations - Contractual
- Tennessee
- Rhode Island
- Delaware
- Expert Qualifications
- Connecticut
- Improvement
- Amazon
- Negligence – Duty
- Design Defect
- Apportionment
- Privity
- Statute of Limitations - Tolling
- Evidence - Hearsay
- Malpractice
- Loss of Use
- Vehicles
- Spoliation
- workers' compensation subrogation
- Warranty - Implied
- Made Whole
- Settlement
- Michigan
- Malfunction Theory; Design Defect
- Comparative Fault
- Independent Duty
- Ohio
- Water Damage
- Condominiums
- Contracts - Formation
- Non-Party at Fault
- Arbitration
- Unconscionable
- Missouri
- Parties
- Wisconsin
- Failure to Warn
- Manufacturing Defect
- Pleading
- Removal
- Entire Controversy Doctrine
- Motion to Intervene
- Res Judicata
- Subrogation; High-Net-Worth; Damages; Art; Cargo-Transportation; Anti-Subrogation Rule
- Products Liability – Risk-Utility
- Lithium-ion battery
- Internet Sales
- Anti-Subrogation Rule; Wyoming; Landlord-Tenant; Sutton Doctrine
- Sanctions
- Spoliation – Fire Scene
- Builder’s Risk
- Contractual Subrogation
- Equitable Subrogation
- Exculpatory Clause
- Gross Negligence
- Insurable Interest
- Mississippi
- Daubert
- Standing
- Third Party
- Accepted Work
- Montana
- Independent Contractor
- Res Ipsa
- New Mexico
- Right to Repair Act
- AIA Contract
- Betterment
- Damages-Code Upgrades
- Statute of Limitations - Repose
- Washington
- Implied Warranty of Habitability
- Warranty - Construction
- Idaho
- Joint-Tortfeasors
- Forum-Venue
- Warranty – Express
- AIA Contracts
- Anti-Indemnity Statutes
- Products Liability - Foreseeability
- Cargo-Transportation
- Contribution
- MCS-90
- Substantial Completion
Authors
Archives
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022