Business Compliance Checklist: Massachusetts Enforces New Consumer Protection Regulations on “Junk Fees” and Deceptive Pricing
Effective September 2, 2025, the Massachusetts Attorney General implemented new regulations prohibiting “junk fees” and deceptive pricing. This new regulation establishes standards for governing the imposition of fees in connection with marketing, solicitation, and the sale of products for personal, family, or household use, as well as trial offers and contracts with negative option features.
More importantly, the regulation also defines “unfair and deceptive acts and practices” that violate Chapter 93, Massachusetts’ consumer protection statute.
Unfair and Deceptive Practices in Connection with Marketing, Solicitation, and Sales
The regulation outlines specific advertising, marketing, or offer of sale practices in Massachusetts that constitute unfair and deceptive practices. To avoid violating the statute, sellers must:
- Disclose the total price of a product (including all fees, charges, or other expenses while excluding government or shipping charges) and display the total price more prominently than any other pricing information;
- Disclose (1) the nature, purpose, and amount of any fees, charges, or expenses, and (2) for any optional or waivable fees, charges, or expenses, disclose the option or waiver and include instructions on how to avoid such fees, charges, and expenses;
- Disclose the final transaction amount, including all government and shipping charges;
- Disclose the total price prior to requiring the consumer to provide any personal information, including billing information; and
- Refrain from misrepresenting that any fees are required by law.
Food and Grocery Delivery
- The regulation specifically notes that food or grocery delivery platforms may advertise the price of menu items set by the restaurant or grocery store. However, they must clearly and conspicuously display the maximum mandatory charges or fees that a consumer must pay.
Housing Rentals and Leases
- In the rental or lease of a dwelling unit, the regulation allows for the total price to be advertised as the dollar amount paid on a periodic basis (such as a monthly term), so long as the seller also discloses the full period covered by the rental or lease.
Unfair and Deceptive Practices in Connection with Recurring Fees and Trial Offers
Trial offers, recurring fees, and negative option features are also addressed by the newly-implemented regulation. To comply with Massachusetts law, sellers must:
- Disclose in writing prior to acceptance of a trial offer any financial obligations, the products for which the consumer may incur a financial obligation, instructions on how to reject or cancel the trial offer before incurring the obligation, the date by which the consumer must reject or cancel the trial offer to avoid the obligation, and the date the consumer will incur the obligation if the trial offer is not rejected or cancelled;
- Disclose in writing prior to the purchase of a product with a negative option feature that the consumer will be charged for the product or charges will increase after any trial period ends; if applicable, that the charges will occur on a recurring basis unless the consumer takes steps to prevent or stop the charges; and instructions on how to cancel the negative option feature and avoid being charged;
- For any product with a negative option feature, provide a simple mechanism to cancel the feature to avoid being charged and immediately stop the recurring charges;
- For any product with a negative option feature greater than 31 days, provide written notice between five and 30 days prior to when the consumer must cancel to avoid incurring a subsequent financial obligation, and include the following items:
- the financial obligation if the consumer fails to cancel the negative option feature;
- all products for which the consumer may incur a financial obligation if they fail to cancel the negative option feature;
- the mechanism by which the feature can be cancelled;
- the date by which the consumer must cancel the feature to avoid a financial obligation; and
- the date the consumer will incur a financial obligation if they fail to cancel the feature.
- For any product with a negative option feature less than 32 days, provide written notice disclosing at least as frequently as the consumer is charged the amount charged at autorenewal and instructions as to the mechanism by which the consumer may cancel the feature and avoid incurring additional charges.
The Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office offers businesses resources to assist with compliance. The full regulation can be found here.
Topics
- ACA
- ACA International
- Amicus Brief
- Anti-Discrimination Policy
- Appellate Decisions
- Appointment Power
- Appraised Value
- Arbitration
- Arbitration Rule
- Article III Standing
- ATDS
- Attorneys' Fees
- Auto-Dialer
- Automatic Telephone Dialing System
- Bankruptcy
- Bankruptcy Code
- behavioral economics
- Biden Administration
- Biometric Information Privacy Act
- Bitcoin
- Blockchain
- BNPL
- Business Records
- California
- California Consumer Financial Protection Law
- California Consumer Privacy Act
- California Court of Appeal
- California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation
- Car Dealership
- CARES Act
- CCPA
- CDC
- CFPA
- CFPB
- Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
- Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
- Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
- Circuit Split
- City of Miami
- Civil Contempt
- Claim-Splitting
- Class Action
- Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
- Class Certification
- Climate Change
- Cole Memorandum
- Colorado
- Commercial Foreclosure
- Communications
- Compliance
- Compliance Audit
- Compliance Corner
- Congressional Review Act
- Connecticut
- Connecticut Insurance Department
- Constitutional Claims
- Consumer Data Privacy
- Consumer Disclosures
- Consumer Financial Protection Act
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
- Consumer Protections
- Coronavirus
- Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
- Corporate Compliance
- Corporate Governance
- COVID-19
- CPRA
- Craigslist
- Credit Report
- Credit Reporting Agencies
- Creditor
- Cryptocurrency
- cyber regulation
- Cybersecurity
- D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
- Damages
- Data Breach
- Data Privacy Laws
- Data Security
- Debt Buyers
- Debt Collection
- Debt Collector
- Debt Dispute
- Debt Purchase
- Debtor
- Deceased Debtors
- Default Notice
- Department of Education
- Department of Financial Protection and Innovation
- Department of Financial Services
- DFPI
- DFS
- DFS Part 500
- Digital Financial Asset Law
- Disclosure
- Discovery Rule
- District of Columbia
- Document Retention
- Dodd-Frank
- Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
- Due Process Clause
- ECOA
- Economic Impact Payment
- Education
- Education Debt
- Eighth Amendment
- Electronic Communications
- Eleventh Amendment
- Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
- Employee Benefits
- Employer Participation Student Loan Assistance Act
- Equal Opportunity Act
- European General Data Privacy Regulation
- Eviction
- Excessive Fines Clause
- Executive Order
- Exempt Status
- Exemption
- FACTA
- Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act
- Fair Credit Billing Act
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
- Fair Employment and Housing Act
- Fair Lending
- Fair Market Value
- Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017
- FCBA
- FCC
- FCRA
- FDCPA
- Federal
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Housing Administration
- Federal Housing Finance Agency
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 68
- Federal Trade Commission
- FHA
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Final Rule
- Financial CHOICE Act
- Financial Registration
- Financial Regulatory
- Financial Risk
- FinTech
- First Amendment
- First Circuit Court of Appeals
- Florida
- Florida Supreme Court
- For-Profit Student Loans
- Forbearance
- Forbearance Agreement
- Foreclosure
- Foreclosure Sale
- Fourteenth Amendment
- Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
- FTC
- Furnishers
- GDPR
- hacking
- Hardship Declaration
- HealthTech
- Hearsay
- HMDA
- Hobbs Act
- HUD
- Human Intervention Test
- Hunstein
- IDFPR
- Illinois
- Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act
- Illinois Predatory Loan Prevention Act
- Illinois Student Loan Bill of Rights
- Illinois Supreme Court
- Investigation
- IRS
- Judicial Estoppel
- Kathleen Kraninger
- Kentucky
- kickbacks
- Lack of Standing
- Landlord and Tenant
- Least Sophisticated Consumer Standard
- Legal Standing
- Legislation
- Lender Credit Bid
- LGBTQ
- Licensing
- Litigation
- Loan Defaults
- Loan Discharge
- Loan Modification
- Loan Servicing
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Mandatory Arbitration
- Marijuana
- Marketing Services Agreements
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Massachusetts Appeals Court
- Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act
- Massachusetts Land Court
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
- Material Misrepresentation
- Materiality Requirement
- Medical Debts
- Medical Expenses
- Medical Marijuana
- Minnesota
- Monetary Damages
- Mortgage
- Mortgage Acceleration
- Mortgage Debt
- Mortgage Foreclosure
- Mortgage Loan Acceleration
- Mortgage Loans
- Mortgage Servicers
- Mortgage Servicing
- Motion to Dismiss
- MSA
- Municipal Code
- Municipal Code Violations
- Nevada
- New Jersey
- New York
- New York City
- New York Court of Appeals
- New York Department of Financial Services
- New York Legislation
- New York Real Property Procedures and Acts
- Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
- NMLS
- North Carolina
- North Carolina Consumer Finance Act
- North Dakota
- Notice of Proposed Rule Making
- NPRM
- NYCRA
- NYS DFS
- Obama Administration
- OFAC
- Office of Foreign Assets Control
- Origination
- Paragraph 22
- Part 500
- Pennsylvania
- Personal Jurisdiction
- Post-Discharge-Communications
- PPP
- Pre-Foreclosure Mediation
- Preemption
- Privacy
- Private Colleges and Universities
- Private Right of Action
- Private Student Loans
- Property Rights
- Property Value
- Proposed Legislation
- Real Estate Settlement Act
- Redlining
- referral fees
- Regulated Entities
- Regulated Non-Depositories
- Regulated Organizations
- Regulation
- Regulation X
- Regulatory
- Regulatory Compliance
- Regulatory Relief
- Remote Working
- Residential Foreclosure
- RESPA
- Reverse Mortgage
- Revocation Claims
- Revocation of Election to Accelerate
- Rhode Island
- Rhode Island Supreme Court
- Richard Cordray
- RICO
- Right of Redemption
- Right to Cure
- Right to Cure Notice
- Right to Reinstate
- Risk Management
- Robocalls
- Rohit Chopra
- S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act
- Safe-Harbor Provision
- Sanitary Codes
- SCOTUS
- Second Circuit Court of Appeals
- Securities & Exchange Commission
- Separation of Powers
- Settlement
- Settlement Conference
- Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
- Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Social Media
- Standard of Proof
- Statute of Limitations
- Statutory Damages
- Statutory Interpretation
- Stimulus
- Student Loans
- Students
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Tax
- Tax Implications
- Tax Lien
- TCPA
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- Texas
- Texting
- Third Circuit Court of Appeals
- TILA
- Trump
- Trump Administration
- Truth in Lending Act
- U.S. Constitution
- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
- UCC
- UDAAP
- Unauthorized Use
- Undue Hardship
- Unfair and Deceptive Practices
- Unfair Competition
- Uniform Commercial Code
- United States Treasury
- Unsolicited Advertisement
- Usury Laws
- Utah
- Video Conferencing
- Virginia
- Virtual Currency Business Act (VCBA)
- Voluntary Discontinuance
- Voluntary Dismissal
- Washington D.C.
- Wisconsin
- Wisconsin Consumer Act